<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First shots of BlackBerry Niagara 9630 &#8211; CDMA Bold/Curve 8900 Crossover!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/</link>
	<description>The latest BlackBerry News and Reviews on BlackBerry Smartphones and BlackBerry PlayBook tablets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian ofsie</title>
		<link>http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-72567</link>
		<dc:creator>brian ofsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackberrysync.com/?p=3924#comment-72567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Websites worth visiting...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Websites worth visiting&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djswerve901</title>
		<link>http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-4077</link>
		<dc:creator>djswerve901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackberrysync.com/?p=3924#comment-4077</guid>
		<description>I know that the storm has a faster processor for the applications but doesn&#039;t have the wi-fi. I personaly like the 8900 curve even though I&#039;m with verizon, I would have to say that the storm sucks by comparison. I&#039;ve wanted the 8900 for some time but don&#039;t like T-mobile. Instead, I&#039;ll just keep using my 8330 curve until Verizon decides to take a better look at the needs of people that use these BB&#039;s for other than just calls and email. A faster processor sounds REALLY good to me because the ability to &quot;flow&quot; though the phones features keeps me feeling secure that the phone isn&#039;t locking up. My 8330 does every now and then, but usually when trying to handle heavy loads. As for the wifi, I use it when available, but it&#039;s not a necessity to me. Give me the 8900 curve with the Storm processor &quot;but on verizon&quot; and I&#039;ll be happy for years!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that the storm has a faster processor for the applications but doesn&#8217;t have the wi-fi. I personaly like the 8900 curve even though I&#8217;m with verizon, I would have to say that the storm sucks by comparison. I&#8217;ve wanted the 8900 for some time but don&#8217;t like T-mobile. Instead, I&#8217;ll just keep using my 8330 curve until Verizon decides to take a better look at the needs of people that use these BB&#8217;s for other than just calls and email. A faster processor sounds REALLY good to me because the ability to &#8220;flow&#8221; though the phones features keeps me feeling secure that the phone isn&#8217;t locking up. My 8330 does every now and then, but usually when trying to handle heavy loads. As for the wifi, I use it when available, but it&#8217;s not a necessity to me. Give me the 8900 curve with the Storm processor &#8220;but on verizon&#8221; and I&#8217;ll be happy for years!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abcyesn</title>
		<link>http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-4060</link>
		<dc:creator>abcyesn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackberrysync.com/?p=3924#comment-4060</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely a nice looking phone.  From the front it looks like a smaller Bold, and from the side it looks like the 8900 Curve.  And with all of the pictures that have been surfacing I would say it shouldn&#039;t be too long before it&#039;s in stores.  Any sure dates yet? can&#039;t even it on http://www.Niagara-BlackBerry.com I hope it will come out sooner or later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely a nice looking phone.  From the front it looks like a smaller Bold, and from the side it looks like the 8900 Curve.  And with all of the pictures that have been surfacing I would say it shouldn&#8217;t be too long before it&#8217;s in stores.  Any sure dates yet? can&#8217;t even it on <a href="http://www.Niagara-BlackBerry.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Niagara-BlackBerry.com</a> I hope it will come out sooner or later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-3895</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackberrysync.com/?p=3924#comment-3895</guid>
		<description>I really hope this is just like the Bold (but with the minor differences.  The lack of Wi-FI doesnt really bother me).  I just want a nice new blackberry on Verizon, and not the Storm cause the Storm sucks.  Does anybody know when this would possibly come out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope this is just like the Bold (but with the minor differences.  The lack of Wi-FI doesnt really bother me).  I just want a nice new blackberry on Verizon, and not the Storm cause the Storm sucks.  Does anybody know when this would possibly come out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-3892</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackberrysync.com/?p=3924#comment-3892</guid>
		<description>Adam Said: &quot;Without WiFi - I wouldn’t touch it. I use the wifi all the time and it’s fantastic for those without ‘all-you-can-eat’ data plans.&quot;

Aren&#039;t you required to have an &#039;all-you-can-eat&#039; data plan with a BlackBerry? The choices I was given when I got my Storm was $29.99 if I want to use just personal email or $44.99 if I want corporate email through a BES. 

Also, I think that since this device is CDMA, it&#039;s either for Verizon or Sprint(most likely Verizon). With that said, CDMA data coverage is far greater than GSM data coverage in the USA. It seems that AT&amp;T uses wi-fi on their models out of necessity. I don&#039;t really see why Verizon would exclude it because I think it would lessen the burden on their network, thus keeping more people happy, but still...it isn&#039;t a necessity on Verizon WIreless. I get decent download speeds on my device as it is. I never wait more than a few seconds(maybe up to 10) for my pages to load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam Said: &#8220;Without WiFi &#8211; I wouldn’t touch it. I use the wifi all the time and it’s fantastic for those without ‘all-you-can-eat’ data plans.&#8221;</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t you required to have an &#8216;all-you-can-eat&#8217; data plan with a BlackBerry? The choices I was given when I got my Storm was $29.99 if I want to use just personal email or $44.99 if I want corporate email through a BES. </p>
<p>Also, I think that since this device is CDMA, it&#8217;s either for Verizon or Sprint(most likely Verizon). With that said, CDMA data coverage is far greater than GSM data coverage in the USA. It seems that AT&amp;T uses wi-fi on their models out of necessity. I don&#8217;t really see why Verizon would exclude it because I think it would lessen the burden on their network, thus keeping more people happy, but still&#8230;it isn&#8217;t a necessity on Verizon WIreless. I get decent download speeds on my device as it is. I never wait more than a few seconds(maybe up to 10) for my pages to load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-3852</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackberrysync.com/?p=3924#comment-3852</guid>
		<description>Without WiFi - I wouldn&#039;t touch it.  I use the wifi all the time and it&#039;s fantastic for those without &#039;all-you-can-eat&#039; data plans.

To me, Niagara is a downgrade from the Bold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without WiFi &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t touch it.  I use the wifi all the time and it&#8217;s fantastic for those without &#8216;all-you-can-eat&#8217; data plans.</p>
<p>To me, Niagara is a downgrade from the Bold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-3851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackberrysync.com/?p=3924#comment-3851</guid>
		<description>Well, I have survivied without wi fi so far, since the other cdma models of BB&#039;s don&#039;t have it. It would be a nice addition though too bad they do not want to include it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have survivied without wi fi so far, since the other cdma models of BB&#8217;s don&#8217;t have it. It would be a nice addition though too bad they do not want to include it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://blackberrysync.com/2009/03/first-shots-of-blackberry-niagara-9630-cdma-boldcurve-8900-crossover/comment-page-1/#comment-3850</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackberrysync.com/?p=3924#comment-3850</guid>
		<description>Who cares about wi-fi?  The current browser and internet isn&#039;t the best, but all I want is HTML emails!!!!! (currently have the 8830</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about wi-fi?  The current browser and internet isn&#8217;t the best, but all I want is HTML emails!!!!! (currently have the 8830</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

